The staff-members have received your unblacklist-request, Haamster.
It will take a while for it to be reviewed.
(Jul 23, 2018, 10:43 PM)Hungames Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 23, 2018, 10:34 PM)Haamster Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see what part I did not bring up.
As you decided to leave we never got any evidence from you, but I'm glad you at least brought the whole video with you. The only evidence that was given were 3 GIFs of around 5 seconds of footage (what I've included in the thread).
That's a blatant lie and Roxas can attest to that. I sent the link numerous times in the chat and before leaving.
That is not something I saw, the only thing I saw were the three Gyazo links. But as said, your video is here now so what's the matter?
In the video you can even hear "haha, ohoh" as you are well aware of what is about to happen. It also shows that your teammates using your car as cover.
I don't even think that's my voice. That was most likely the realization of the cops showing up. Why would I predict getting mowed down for literally no reason?
You did not get "mowed down for literally no reason", you were entering a compound, of which there were heavily armed criminals both inside and outside, and you decided to keep going once you saw the police. It was your own choice to enter and as such be in the middle of the crossfire.
Nothing in that video is contradictory to what I've stated.
The whole pursuit and police interaction thing is completely contradictory to the video. At no point did any officers even attempt to initiate a stop or pursuit. The one officer quite nearly cuts me off and crashes into me but continues on his merry way. I even turn and look around several times to see if the dude was going after me for his stupidity.
The reason you didn't see any cop cars behind you was because they were lagging behind and confused as to which car they were chasing.
That you were out of voice range to hear us shout "get out of the car!" was unfortunate, but if your judgement is to not only keep going, but stop your car, see two police cars with their lights on, officers with weapons pointed towards you, and you still keep going, that is completely of your own fault.
Sadly I don't have any evidence to show the police voice radio claiming to be in a pursuit of a white Nissan Skyline, but the fact that two police cars show up behind you at the compound, with their lights on, should have given you a hint. And again, the reason I opened fire was because you intentionally went into a criminal compound, guarded by heavily armed men.
Don't try to tell me you had no idea there would be a firefight.
It was completely your choice to continue going into the compound, you could have left the vehicle and put your hands up and you would certainly not have been shot at, but you decided that your armed up buddies could help you take down the cops.
The only thing I've heard so far has been "but I was in a car!", all the while full well knowing that you were among a group of criminals who were heavily armed and you decided to enter the lot anyway. And seeing as there was a gate, which was closed and then opened specifically for you, it is entirely within reason to assume that you are part of this gang and would gladly take out your weapons and start shooting as soon as you got into the compound.
I fully stand by my actions and I disagree that shooting you was in anyway a mistake or wrongdoing as you were well aware of the situation you put yourself in.
(Jul 23, 2018, 11:17 PM)Haamster Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 23, 2018, 10:43 PM)Hungames Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 23, 2018, 10:34 PM)Haamster Wrote: [ -> ]I fail to see what part I did not bring up.
As you decided to leave we never got any evidence from you, but I'm glad you at least brought the whole video with you. The only evidence that was given were 3 GIFs of around 5 seconds of footage (what I've included in the thread).
That's a blatant lie and Roxas can attest to that. I sent the link numerous times in the chat and before leaving.
That is not something I saw, the only thing I saw were the three Gyazo links. But as said, your video is here now so what's the matter?
In the video you can even hear "haha, ohoh" as you are well aware of what is about to happen. It also shows that your teammates using your car as cover.
I don't even think that's my voice. That was most likely the realization of the cops showing up. Why would I predict getting mowed down for literally no reason?
You did not get "mowed down for literally no reason", you were entering a compound, of which there were heavily armed criminals both inside and outside, and you decided to keep going once you saw the police. It was your own choice to enter and as such be in the middle of the crossfire.
Nothing in that video is contradictory to what I've stated.
The whole pursuit and police interaction thing is completely contradictory to the video. At no point did any officers even attempt to initiate a stop or pursuit. The one officer quite nearly cuts me off and crashes into me but continues on his merry way. I even turn and look around several times to see if the dude was going after me for his stupidity.
The reason you didn't see any cop cars behind you was because they were lagging behind and confused as to which car they were chasing.
That you were out of voice range to hear us shout "get out of the car!" was unfortunate, but if your judgement is to not only keep going, but stop your car, see two police cars with their lights on, officers with weapons pointed towards you, and you still keep going, that is completely of your own fault.
Sadly I don't have any evidence to show the police voice radio claiming to be in a pursuit of a white Nissan Skyline, but the fact that two police cars show up behind you at the compound, with their lights on, should have given you a hint. And again, the reason I opened fire was because you intentionally went into a criminal compound, guarded by heavily armed men.
Don't try to tell me you had no idea there would be a firefight.
It was completely your choice to continue going into the compound, you could have left the vehicle and put your hands up and you would certainly not have been shot at, but you decided that your armed up buddies could help you take down the cops.
The only thing I've heard so far has been "but I was in a car!", all the while full well knowing that you were among a group of criminals who were heavily armed and you decided to enter the lot anyway. And seeing as there was a gate, which was closed and then opened specifically for you, it is entirely within reason to assume that you are part of this gang and would gladly take out your weapons and start shooting as soon as you got into the compound.
I fully stand by my actions and I disagree that shooting you was in anyway a mistake or wrongdoing as you were well aware of the situation you put yourself in.
Why were you after him in the first place? Video clearly shows him following traffic laws and you weren't even chasing him.
To put it into context of rules, the relevant rule (I assume) would be 11.7, which reads as follow:
11.7 -
"You cannot kill unarmed people or those who no longer pose a threat (injured, unconscious, handcuffed, etc). The only exception is if there is a dictator who orders an execution or capital punishment for an appropriate crime has been issued. You can shoot at fleeing vehicles only if the drivers are armed and dangerous or if they are clearly a threat to citizen/officers with the way they are driving. "
My side to this story is that I claim that you were armed and dangerous.
Although we can I retrospect see that you were not personally armed, you knowingly entered an area belonging to your friends, who indeed were visibly heavily armed, and by being part of this group you can be assumed to be armed and dangerous as well.
I simply don't see anything rule breakingly wrong with my character's decisions. Could they have been, from an in-game perspective, better? Sure, but this is RP after all. Not all things go to plan. I don't see anything OOC wrong with someone being caught in crossfire in a criminal hideout. An unfortunate casualty at least, and a preemptive take down at most, either way I don't see anything wrong with what went down.
(Jul 23, 2018, 11:33 PM)Haamster Wrote: [ -> ]To put it into context of rules, the relevant rule (I assume) would be 11.7, which reads as follow:
11.7 -
"You cannot kill unarmed people or those who no longer pose a threat (injured, unconscious, handcuffed, etc). The only exception is if there is a dictator who orders an execution or capital punishment for an appropriate crime has been issued. You can shoot at fleeing vehicles only if the drivers are armed and dangerous or if they are clearly a threat to citizen/officers with the way they are driving. "
My side to this story is that I claim that you were armed and dangerous.
Although we can I retrospect see that you were not personally armed, you knowingly entered an area belonging to your friends, who indeed were visibly heavily armed, and by being part of this group you can be assumed to be armed and dangerous as well.
I simply don't see anything rule breakingly wrong with my character's decisions. Could they have been, from an in-game perspective, better? Sure, but this is RP after all. Not all things go to plan. I don't see anything OOC wrong with someone being caught in crossfire in a criminal hideout. An unfortunate casualty at least, and a preemptive take down at most, either way I don't see anything wrong with what went down.
Any reason you refuse to answer my question?
(Jul 23, 2018, 11:33 PM)Haamster Wrote: [ -> ]To put it into context of rules, the relevant rule (I assume) would be 11.7, which reads as follow:
11.7 -
"You cannot kill unarmed people or those who no longer pose a threat (injured, unconscious, handcuffed, etc). The only exception is if there is a dictator who orders an execution or capital punishment for an appropriate crime has been issued. You can shoot at fleeing vehicles only if the drivers are armed and dangerous or if they are clearly a threat to citizen/officers with the way they are driving. "
My side to this story is that I claim that you were armed and dangerous.
Although we can I retrospect see that you were not personally armed, you knowingly entered an area belonging to your friends, who indeed were visibly heavily armed, and by being part of this group you can be assumed to be armed and dangerous as well.
Just because I am in an area with armed people doesn't give you the right to assume that everyone in the area is armed and therefore a threat.
I simply don't see anything rule breakingly wrong with my character's decisions. Could they have been, from an in-game perspective, better? Sure, but this is RP after all. Not all things go to plan. I don't see anything OOC wrong with someone being caught in crossfire in a criminal hideout. An unfortunate casualty at least, and a preemptive take down at most, either way I don't see anything wrong with what went down.
You say crossfire, yet I was the first target of the shots and the first to die. That isn't crossfire. That is targeting.
I reviewed the video and comments on all sides,
What troubles me and validates the blacklist in my eyes is this sentence (the bolded) from Haamster;
Quote:The reason for shooting at the car itself was twofold:
1. As it was entering the property, taking it out would leave their gate open.
2. The armed men immediately used the car as cover, leaving me no option but to shoot towards where it was. The driver was in no way forced onto the lot and could simply have resolved the traffic violation before entering, but decided to take a bet on that his teammates would take out the cops before he would be taken down.
Just because someone is entering a property does not mean they were armed and that they were criminals. He could have been a salesman and you wouldn't have known until after you killed him and they certainly shouldn't be used as a gate stopper.
Also quoting a part of the rule 11.7;
Quote:You can shoot at fleeing vehicles only if the drivers are armed and dangerous or if they are clearly a threat to citizen/officers with the way they are driving.
Hungames was not confirmed to be armed and dangerous and was not a clear threat to citizens and officers with the way he was driving and just entering a property even if has people armed should not be a reason to shoot at the person. It was excessive, and the blacklist was valid.
With Roxas' request I'll be denying this appeal.
The situation was reviewed and the blacklist was found valid.