(Jul 26, 2018, 03:16 PM)rule-following corgi Wrote: [ -> ]3 days since Marsh's last reply.
I don't know if it's incompetence or the fact he knows he's wrong?
Or the fact that double checking 100000 kills might take a while.
(Jul 26, 2018, 04:42 PM)Overlewd Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2018, 03:16 PM)rule-following corgi Wrote: [ -> ]3 days since Marsh's last reply.
I don't know if it's incompetence or the fact he knows he's wrong?
Or the fact that double checking 100000 kills might take a while.
By his responses, he hasn't checked them the first time. Nevermind going over them.
To conclude this request.
The Fear-RP violation is documented by solid proof. Therefore the ban wont be altered.
As for the exessive force:
In a second review of the evidence it came to my attention that i overlooked a detail that rendered the claim of "exessive force" meaningless.
As a conclusion. Your ban will be altered to only include the Fear-RP violation and your blacklist will be removed.
I apologise for the inconvenience. Yet ill have to ask for a better attitude as the one that was beeing portrayed is not supportive.
(Jul 26, 2018, 08:36 PM)MrMarsh Wrote: [ -> ]To conclude this request.
The Fear-RP violation is documented by solid proof. Therefore the ban wont be altered.
As for the exessive force:
In a second review of the evidence it came to my attention that i overlooked a detail that rendered the claim of "exessive force" meaningless.
As a conclusion. Your ban will be altered to only include the Fear-RP violation and your blacklist will be removed.
I apologise for the inconvenience. Yet ill have to ask for a better attitude as the one that was beeing portrayed is not supportive.
While it's understandable that my attitude was a bit off, you must understand that this could have been avoided with a second review of the evidence before the punishment was given.
Thanks regardless for the outcome!