Jun 2, 2018, 11:45 PM
Pages: 1 2
Jun 3, 2018, 09:41 AM
(Jun 2, 2018, 11:45 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 2, 2018, 10:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 2, 2018, 10:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]
after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit.
after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached.
after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.
You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp
it does
You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't
Jun 3, 2018, 09:42 AM
(Jun 3, 2018, 09:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]Militant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add(Jun 2, 2018, 11:45 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 2, 2018, 10:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp
it does
You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't
Jun 3, 2018, 09:57 AM
(Jun 3, 2018, 09:42 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 3, 2018, 09:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]Militant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add(Jun 2, 2018, 11:45 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]it does
You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't
![[Image: 2b6874130895e26d693bfa191bf74c4b.png]](https://i.gyazo.com/2b6874130895e26d693bfa191bf74c4b.png)
Where does it say Militant
Jun 3, 2018, 09:57 AM
Jun 3, 2018, 09:58 AM
(Jun 3, 2018, 09:57 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]Atleast give a response, the K attitude is pointless it just shows you cant come up with another invalid argument...(Jun 2, 2018, 10:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 2, 2018, 10:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]
after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit.
after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached.
after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.
You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp
k
Jun 3, 2018, 09:59 AM
(Jun 3, 2018, 09:58 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 3, 2018, 09:57 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]Atleast give a response, the K attitude is pointless it just shows you cant come up with another invalid argument...(Jun 2, 2018, 10:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp
k
im agreein lol cos i cba to argue, i finna try enjoy my sunday
Jun 3, 2018, 02:33 PM
Approved for the wall height. Otherwise, under investigation still.
Jun 4, 2018, 01:17 PM
Jun 4, 2018, 01:29 PM
(Jun 2, 2018, 09:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]theres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330 the whole time.....(Jun 2, 2018, 09:48 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 2, 2018, 09:26 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]Involved in the raid
How did puffitee out of no where get onto the roof of 327 to snipe?
Their walkway was tall enough to allow them to jump onto the roof
To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to me
Jun 4, 2018, 01:31 PM
(Jun 3, 2018, 09:57 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 3, 2018, 09:42 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 3, 2018, 09:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn'tMilitant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add
Where does it say Militant
A37 in general, people gun down police with just their clan tag, i couldve done everything i did just by putting corporal next to it, but i didnt cos its too vague and a dick move.
Jun 4, 2018, 03:46 PM
(Jun 4, 2018, 01:29 PM)II’mRicky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]327 is the building opposite which puff tee sniped from(Jun 2, 2018, 09:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]theres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330(Jun 2, 2018, 09:48 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Their walkway was tall enough to allow them to jump onto the roof
To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to me
I’m the whole time.....
Phone
Jun 4, 2018, 05:23 PM
(Jun 4, 2018, 03:46 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ](Jun 4, 2018, 01:29 PM)II’mRicky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]327 is the building opposite which puff tee sniped from(Jun 2, 2018, 09:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to metheres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330
I’m the whole time.....
Phone
ok well i had no part in that and no knowledge of it, and to confirm, we had no "ladder" that somehow crossed the road and went unnoticed by cops lol
Jun 4, 2018, 05:42 PM
Jun 5, 2018, 04:01 AM
Unable to find supporting evidence for other violations, due to the gang RP which was occurring within the area.
Pages: 1 2