Limelight Forums

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 09:27 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Reported Players: Tyrone/Ricky/PawnShop (STEAM_0:1:118528806)  ()
Server: Rockford
Time: 2018-Jun-02 19:00
Summary: 8.2 - Walls used to surround a base can't be more than 4 metres (PHX units) tall. If there are uneven surfaces where the walls are placed, some leniency will be allowed to compensate.
2

8.5 - Bases which have extremely unfair advantages for the defending party, including but not limited to: crouch/prone-only entrances, mazes, long narrow corridors, entrance keypads being visible by the defenders, and others, can be considered a Doomfort and aren't allowed.


At 0:42, you can see me rolling up on the suspect I am chasing, Tyrone's, massive base. Tyrone is a "Car Thief", and his 'chop shot' has walls that are at about 8 PHX units high, armed to the teeth with 2 or 3 other people.

8.6 - Your base must fit your character's roleplay. E.g Poor characters can't afford to base in high-tech pseudo-military bases.

Evidence: ^

 

after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit. 

after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached. 

after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.

You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

it does

(Jun 3, 2018, 12:45 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ] 

after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit. 

after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached. 

after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.

You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

it does

You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 12:45 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

it does

You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't

Militant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:42 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 12:45 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]it does

You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't

Militant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add

Where does it say Militant

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 09:27 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Reported Players: Tyrone/Ricky/PawnShop (STEAM_0:1:118528806)  ()
Server: Rockford
Time: 2018-Jun-02 19:00
Summary: 8.2 - Walls used to surround a base can't be more than 4 metres (PHX units) tall. If there are uneven surfaces where the walls are placed, some leniency will be allowed to compensate.
2

8.5 - Bases which have extremely unfair advantages for the defending party, including but not limited to: crouch/prone-only entrances, mazes, long narrow corridors, entrance keypads being visible by the defenders, and others, can be considered a Doomfort and aren't allowed.


At 0:42, you can see me rolling up on the suspect I am chasing, Tyrone's, massive base. Tyrone is a "Car Thief", and his 'chop shot' has walls that are at about 8 PHX units high, armed to the teeth with 2 or 3 other people.

8.6 - Your base must fit your character's roleplay. E.g Poor characters can't afford to base in high-tech pseudo-military bases.

Evidence: ^

 

after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit. 

after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached. 

after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.

You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

k

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:57 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:09 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ] 

after reading the definition of 8.2, i can confirm i was in violation of the height limit. 

after reading the definition of 8.5, i can confirm i was NOT in violation as the attacking party was not visible while trying to keypad crack so only the height limit was breached. 

after reading rule 8.6, i can confirm i was not in violation due there being multiple other people using it for different purposes, we are a heavily militarised clan and the base fitted the needs and roleplay style of the 5 or 6 members inside, all with different jobs.

You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

k

Atleast give a response, the K attitude is pointless it just shows you cant come up with another invalid argument...

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:58 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:57 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You are in violation of 8.6, it's your base weather people inside t are different I jobs you a still own the large wall base so it must fit your characters rp

k

Atleast give a response, the K attitude is pointless it just shows you cant come up with another invalid argument...

im agreein lol cos i cba to argue, i finna try enjoy my sunday

Approved for the wall height. Otherwise, under investigation still.

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:48 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:26 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]Involved in the raid

How did puffitee out of no where get onto the roof of 327 to snipe?

Their walkway was tall enough to allow them to jump onto the roof

To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to me

theres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330 the whole time.....

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:57 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:42 AM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 3, 2018, 10:41 AM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]You're a car thief with a base that looks like a SWAT HQ as a petty car thief, so no it doesn't

Militant car thief armed with Ak's and M249's may i add

Where does it say Militant

A37 in general, people gun down police with just their clan tag, i couldve done everything i did just by putting corporal next to it, but i didnt cos its too vague and a dick move.

(Jun 4, 2018, 02:29 PM)II’mRicky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:48 PM)Dan Wrote: [ -> ]Their walkway was tall enough to allow them to jump onto the roof

To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to me

theres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330
I’m the whole time.....

327 is the building opposite which puff tee sniped from


Phone

(Jun 4, 2018, 04:46 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 4, 2018, 02:29 PM)II’mRicky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 2, 2018, 10:57 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]To jump from 330 all the way to 327 without anyone noticing? With no trace of a ladder either? Seems like ladder abuse to me

theres no such thing as 327, we stayed at 330
I’m the whole time.....

327 is the building opposite which puff tee sniped from


Phone

ok well i had no part in that and no knowledge of it, and to confirm, we had no "ladder" that somehow crossed the road and went unnoticed by cops lol

(Jun 4, 2018, 02:17 PM)Ricky LaFleur Wrote: [ -> ] just got a PTE blacklist for the base, so its safe to say the only thing im being accused of right now is failrp for my job right? correct me if im wrong

Read the OP

Unable to find supporting evidence for other violations, due to the gang RP which was occurring within the area.