Limelight Forums

I recently posted a Warning Removal Request, it got denied by Blackdog as apparently it broke rule 1.7

This rule doesn't mention anything about Gambling sites in names so I don't see a CLEAR outline of a rule breakage here?

• 1.9 - Purposefully attempting to find loopholes in the rules will likely result in punishment.
  

u in trouble now

(Feb 24, 2018, 10:17 PM)monk Wrote: [ -> ]

• 1.9 - Purposefully attempting to find loopholes in the rules will likely result in punishment.
  

u in trouble now

xd

The blacklist is fair imo, rules say no advertisement for a reason - they don't want you to advertise. If you wanna get technical about the wording of the rule, gambling websites are hosted on servers which is stated in the rule.

The original rule was very restrictive and got changed in one of the rule overhauls but probably not ideally written yet. However, it is pretty natural that we would not tolerate any advertisement of harmful or potentially harmful links (which quite a lot of that type of website are).

Can we get an update on this as it has been answered.

You have 7 days to reply otherwise this thread will be classified as inactive meaning the thread will be closed and archived but can be restored by talking to a teacher or re-creating your thread if the situation comes around.

Date: Monday 5th March 2018

(Feb 27, 2018, 06:27 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ] 
This was only posted 3 days ago...

He has been given an answer, at this point unless he has any further questions this thread has served its purpose and is no longer needed in this section.

Closed.

Deadline was met.