Name of Player: Sourlemon and [C3] Dan
SteamID:
[font=open_sansregular, Arial, sans-serif]STEAM_0:0:80374954[/font]
[font=open_sansregular, Arial, sans-serif]STEAM_0:1:34190735[/font]
Server: Main EU Server
Time: (In UTC+0) 16:00
Summary: Give us context and what rules they broke. They put my car into the ravine when they were meant to impound it. Upon speaking with them they said I CDMd two people and that's the only reason they would have done that sort of thing. They backseat administrated and FailRP is also a factor here. With the hours these players have, I'd expect them to know better.
Thank you for your player-report, Hank.
It will take a while for it to be reviewed by our staff-members.
Meanwhile, the accused player and witnesses may reply to this report.
I didn't put your vehicle in the ravine, please post a screenshot that actually shows me doing that.
That is you driving away, isn't it? Tell me why you were in the bushes then and why you stopped to tell me that I "wasn't getting my car back" before putting it in the ravine. Plus I'd also like to hear from Dan on this.
Sorry do you actually have any evidence? Maybe you'd care to talk about you intentionally CDMing people?
We can deal with that matter later. But for now, I do have evidence it is listed on the PR if you would care to view that would be much appreciated.
I will not be posting any replies until an admin has stepped in and reviewed the situation.
Do you have any further evidence to provide?
Currently the evidence does not show the accused in any way besides a scoreboard.
Screenshot 1 is just the scoreboard
Screenshot 2 is an unidentified police vehicle in the distance with no way of knowing whos it is, or who is behind the wheel
Screenshot 3 is an unidentified vehicle with no way of telling who it belongs to
Mr. Blackdog if you would so kindly come in the game right now and I will prove to you that it is my car. As it is still sitting right where he left it.
Also on the 2nd piece of evidence why would a cop drive round that way? The road ends there. There is no other reason for him to be there unless he can provide evidence to state otherwise.
Those screenshots still do not in any way prove what you have claimed.
The first shot just shows your car, not at the location it was, thus not proveing it was infact the car in the ravine zone.
The second shot is not even in the same area as the first shot, and thus does not show it was infact the car in the first original shot.
Do you have any more evidence that shows they we're in the area, that their vehicle was present, and most importantly, that shows they actualy did what you claim?
Denied
No evidence could be provided that shows any wrongdoing of any kind