Limelight Forums

I believe I said in radio he said he would kill us

That's not what I'm asking, I'm asking how the president told you to do what you want.

Voice I believe

I see. But the point stands that the warrant for the player who was killed in the evidence was never denied in the first place.

I'm sure it was.ill see there is screenshot

https://youtu.be/FihD4985yZw
about a minuite before the exacution.

Is memeboisxd aware that asking to be killed is normally considered a violation of FearRP/FailRP?

Im asking in a weird third-person way because I'm not sure if monk posting this from memebois' perspective means he can't post himself or not.

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:19 PM)Overlewd Wrote: [ -> ]Is memeboisxd aware that asking to be killed is normally considered a violation of FearRP/FailRP?

Im asking in a weird third-person way because I'm not sure if monk posting this from memebois' perspective means he can't post himself or not.

Were he online I'd ask for his answer or for him to post. Though I would imagine that he said that in a quasi-OOC manner; kinda like in a "yeah just go ahead and execute me we're already gathering evidence for a PR" way. Not that I would know, though. I'm not him. Either way, if killing someone who asked to be killed isn't a rule break as well I'm going to have to let my mans Carl know he should make a request to have his warning for "Finishing off the president because he was ordered to" removed.

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:52 PM)monk Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:19 PM)Overlewd Wrote: [ -> ]Is memeboisxd aware that asking to be killed is normally considered a violation of FearRP/FailRP?

Im asking in a weird third-person way because I'm not sure if monk posting this from memebois' perspective means he can't post himself or not.

Were he online I'd ask for his answer or for him to post. Though I would imagine that he said that in a quasi-OOC manner; kinda like in a "yeah just go ahead and execute me we're already gathering evidence for a PR" way. Not that I would know, though. I'm not him. Either way, if killing someone who asked to be killed isn't a rule break as well I'm going to have to let my mans Carl know he should make a request to have his warning for "Finishing off the president because he was ordered to" removed.

Did I ever say it wasn't a rule break? I don't recall. (I didn't.)

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:58 PM)Overlewd Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:52 PM)monk Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:19 PM)Overlewd Wrote: [ -> ]Is memeboisxd aware that asking to be killed is normally considered a violation of FearRP/FailRP?

Im asking in a weird third-person way because I'm not sure if monk posting this from memebois' perspective means he can't post himself or not.

Were he online I'd ask for his answer or for him to post. Though I would imagine that he said that in a quasi-OOC manner; kinda like in a "yeah just go ahead and execute me we're already gathering evidence for a PR" way. Not that I would know, though. I'm not him. Either way, if killing someone who asked to be killed isn't a rule break as well I'm going to have to let my mans Carl know he should make a request to have his warning for "Finishing off the president because he was ordered to" removed.

Did I ever say it wasn't a rule break? I don't recall. (I didn't.)

Sorry I wasn't saying it like that, but I also don't recall saying that I said that you said that he she we said it wasn't. Or something.

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:52 PM)monk Wrote: [ -> ]I would imagine that he said that in a quasi-OOC manner; kinda like in a "yeah just go ahead and execute me we're already gathering evidence for a PR" way.

You where gathering evidence of what before i exacuted you then?

(Jun 14, 2017, 07:28 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]

(Jun 14, 2017, 05:52 PM)monk Wrote: [ -> ]I would imagine that he said that in a quasi-OOC manner; kinda like in a "yeah just go ahead and execute me we're already gathering evidence for a PR" way.

You where gathering evidence of what before i exacuted you then?

Your excessive tasing and throwing a concussion grenade at us.

cause you wouldnt be quite when i had my tazer at you

(Jun 14, 2017, 07:34 PM)Vimpto Wrote: [ -> ]cause you wouldnt be quite when i had my tazer at you

And then you threw a concussion grenade.

Approved.

The accused has been found in violation of rule 12.12. In your own words you were told to "do what you want", which is not an order of execution. In addition, the arrest warrant was never denied according to the logs. The man is handcuffed and poses no immediate threat to you so you cannot just execute him. A weapon blacklist will be issued.

Additionally memeboisxd will receive a permanent warning for asking to be killed.