Limelight Forums

Full Version: British Snap Election
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
British Snap Election

Hello, I don't know whether non-brits know about this, but our current prime minister, Theresa May has called a snap election, which some people say is because of Brexit.

The main two parties are 

Labour 
[Image: 4nZ4E4E.jpg]

This is seen as the left wing party and it's leader, Jeremy Corbyn is certainly left wing too. This man never lies and is generally what a real politician should be. Many people don't like him because of the claims he makes but recently the Labour party has become very popular!
  

  If people would like to read up on the history of Jeremy Corbyn in the past 10 years, I found this on Reddit which summarises things:
   Sorry I couldn't put it into a spoiler for some reason
Quote:Ok this is long but a lot has happened...
Basically the Labour party is traditionally socialist.
The party was in opposition to Thatcher through the 1980s but kept losing. When Thatcher lost the leadership and the Conservatives went into relative chaos labour thought they could win the next election. They did not. They were screwed by a right-wing press.
Cue Labour shifting to the right to win votes and Rupert Murdoch's media empire. The press is now on their side. They win the next election in 1997 in a landslide under Tony Blair. But the party is now pretty much neo-liberal and not socialist. Private finance and competition allowed into the NHS, private railways, private energy sector, private finance in schools, all potential "New labour policies"
Now Labour have moved to become very much like the Conservatives, but with a little more social conscience. Most importantly they keep a deregulated financial sector.
Cue the 2008 crash. All of a sudden everyone is up in arms.
The country is is debt, but we don't own anything important. Hospitals are effectively mortgaged to the hilt (pfi). Power stations are in private hands, water is in private hands. The country has no assets. We look skint. Following a Conservative lead on finances has failed. 30 years of neo-liberal economics are now hitting home.
2010 election "victory" for the Conservatives. (actually a coalition.). Neither of the main parties actually won and the Conservatives give a smaller 3rd party token concessions to form a government. Now we get austerity. Spending on public services plummets. The economy stagnates. Tax revenues fall. The deficit remains. We are given more austerity. Lower wages. More people on welfare spending rises. The deficit remains. The national debt doubles in 5 years.
2015 election
The country now looks really shit. Both parties have fucked up.
Labour try what they did in 1997. Neo-liberal policies, not much different from the Conservatives. Under Ed Milliband
Scotland (having kept their power and water in public hands, free tuition, etc) want to vote socialist. They know it works. Labour loses Scotland to the Scottish National Party.
With a record low level of the vote as so many voted for outside parties the conservatives win overall control. (with ~37% of the vote)
Ed Milliband resigns, Labour have a leadership election.
Now since 1997 the top of the party have been Neo-Liberal. Aiming for the centrist vote. Most of the MPs have been selected during this time and they are largely expecting the party to be similar to under Tony Blair. In fact Tony Blair centralised the selection process to ensure candidates selected at this time were not selected by local party members but the central party office themselves. They are what we call "Blairites".
But as they are meant to be a left wing party. They feel the need to put up a left-wing outsider for the leadership. Candidates are nominated by MPs. Jeremy Corbyn is back bench MP who has held his seat from the pre-Blair days. He wouldn't have made the cut, but in order to "widen the debate" and appear left wing. Some MPs "lend him their vote" so he makes the cut.
Shock, the members of the public who make up the party membership are still left wing. As are the unions who fund it. Momentum builds up behind Corbyn. New people join the party to vote for him. He wins the leadership by a large margin.
Thus Jeremy Corbyn isn't liked by his MPs, they didn't want him. He's to the left of them.
Labour now are terrified they can't win an election with a right-wing press and a left-wing leader.
Every opportunity they have they try and make him resign. He doesn't.
Brexit vote happens. Labour use it as an excuse to vote for "no confidence in Corbyn". (It was bullshit, but they were going to use anything they could)
Corbyn does not get nominated. There is a legal battle to ensure he is allowed on the ballot in the leadership election this time as an incumbent who did not resign. He wins this legal battle. He is allowed on the ballot.
Even more people join the party to vote for him. The party put up associate membership fees to discourage people doing this. They still join and vote for him. He wins the leadership by a landslide. His MPs have to admit defeat but they are now at 25% in the polls. They are seen as in disarray. The MPs themselves are unpopular with party membership.
All the slurs Labour have flung at their own leader to get him to lose have stuck in the right-wing press.
2017 election called: Labour are still at 25% in the polls. Conservatives are 50%
Election impartiality rules kick in for sections of the press. Labour release a socialist manifesto. People like it. Without the Labour MPs attacking their leader, he gains some popularity back (not all there is still a huge amount of mud to sling left from the leadership fights).
Labour are currently 34-40% in the polls to the Conservatives 39-45%. The gap is between 1% and 12% largely dependent on who turns out to vote.
Millions of the under 35s registered to vote in the lead up to this election. After being out voted on Brexit due to turnout, this might be the election the young finally swing it against the baby boomers.
If Labour get a hung parliament they'll have pulled of a miracle from when the campaign started.
Theresa May will have expected a majority of 100 or more when she triggered the election. Losing seats would be the biggest political upset since Churchill lost the election after the war. (again to a socialist Labour government, then under Clement Atlee.)






Conservative/Tory Party
[Image: OaUIpl4.jpg]
The leader of this party is Theresa May, our current prime-minister. She has made up many lies, including saying that she was not going to create a snap election. The conservatives are not as popular this year because of their manifesto, which basically said that if you are an elderly person, you must pay for your own care if you have combined savings and property worth more than £100,000. Many people aren't happy with this policy and people have named it "Dementia tax"



In my opinion, I am not a large fan of the conservative party as they haven't done much since 2010 apart from screwing up our country even more (E.g privatisation of the NHS)

(Sorry if all my points aren't correct, I am only a 14 year old kid. Being 14 also means that my political opinion doesn't mean anything)
But anyways! What is your opinion on the British Snap Election and which party do you prefer? (I know there is other parties so if you'd like to state your opinion on those that'd be great!)


- Quest
(Jun 5, 2017, 06:47 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ]"This man never lies and is generally what a real politician should be"

Let's take a look at that.

1. Corbyn walked past empty seats on a train carriage, sat on the floor, recorded a video and made up a story of how it was “ram-packed.”

2. He caught lying on TV the day after the Brexit vote. See more.

3. He lied when he said that the Labour Party was polling level with the Tories before the coup. 

[Image: ujpYjE4.png]

4. He said membership of the Labour Party at 540,000 was the biggest it’s ever been. But between 1945 and 1980 membership was considerably higher, over a million for a few years in 1951.

[Image: 4kGgnv7.png]

5. He claimed Labour had gained seats at the last assembly election. But the party’s overall number of Senedd seats fell from 30 to 29; Labour won no extra seats at the May poll, and lost Rhondda to Plaid Cymru.

[Image: zxLeuwG.png]

6. He told Red Pepper he had had “never had any higher education of any sort,” whereas he, in fact, dropped out of North London Polytechnic after a year.
(Jun 5, 2017, 07:08 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 06:47 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ]"This man never lies and is generally what a real politician should be"



4. He said membership of the Labour Party at 540,000 was the biggest it’s ever been. But between 1945 and 1980 membership was considerably higher, over a million for a few years in 1951.

[Image: 4kGgnv7.png]

They may have meant in the last 10 - 20 years? I mean when the labour memberships were higher, the party was completely different (because of Tony Blair in the early 2000's)
(Jun 5, 2017, 07:08 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 06:47 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ]"This man never lies and is generally what a real politician should be"

3. He lied when he said that the Labour Party was polling level with the Tories before the coup. 

[Image: ujpYjE4.png]

Even though that is his twitter, it could be run by some sort or PR team.
1. In the video he clearly states that he believes the Labour Party was at the "biggest membership there has ever been."
2. His account, his responsibility. If Trump's team tweeted "Kill all Muslims" then people would be having a field day against him personally - not his team.

Regardless, he has a record of lying with the aim to deceive the public.

Alas, in the words of Mark Twain, "If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.”
Corbyn is a cuck, May is weak..but at least her policies aren't going to launch our generation into crippling debt for the years to come. (And yes much worse than our current debt twinned with a much older population ((so more money spent for NHS, care etc)) means huge changes to either our tax system or public services, will be willing to wager on the latter.

Think beyond the next 5 years and vote tory
(Jun 5, 2017, 09:17 PM)Jono Wrote: [ -> ]Corbyn is a cuck, May is weak..but at least her policies aren't going to launch our generation into crippling debt for the years to come. (And yes much worse than our current debt twinned with a much older population ((so more money spent for NHS, care etc)) means huge changes to either our tax system or public services, will be willing to wager on the latter.

Think beyond the next 5 years and vote tory

Considering your signature I'm hoping this is ironic lol
(Jun 5, 2017, 10:01 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 09:17 PM)Jono Wrote: [ -> ]Corbyn is a cuck, May is weak..but at least her policies aren't going to launch our generation into crippling debt for the years to come. (And yes much worse than our current debt twinned with a much older population ((so more money spent for NHS, care etc)) means huge changes to either our tax system or public services, will be willing to wager on the latter.

Think beyond the next 5 years and vote tory

Considering your signature I'm hoping this is ironic lol

What is your point exactly?
(Jun 5, 2017, 10:12 PM)Jono Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 10:01 PM)Quest Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 09:17 PM)Jono Wrote: [ -> ]Corbyn is a cuck, May is weak..but at least her policies aren't going to launch our generation into crippling debt for the years to come. (And yes much worse than our current debt twinned with a much older population ((so more money spent for NHS, care etc)) means huge changes to either our tax system or public services, will be willing to wager on the latter.

Think beyond the next 5 years and vote tory

Considering your signature I'm hoping this is ironic lol

What is your point exactly?

Nothing ahaha
Iam not living in the UK/england but from what I saw I would throw both of them into a trash can.
(Jun 5, 2017, 10:36 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]Iam not living in the UK/england but from what I saw I would throw both of them into a trash can.

Basically what we already thought about the US election...
Vote labour.

Socialism is a step closer to national socialism.
(Jun 6, 2017, 12:51 AM)Rizion Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jun 5, 2017, 10:36 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]Iam not living in the UK/england but from what I saw I would throw both of them into a trash can.

Basically what we already thought about the US election...

You can't really compared Corbyn to Hillary Clinton. She was terrible. Both of our candidates aren't as big as a joke as the US 2016 election.
(Jun 6, 2017, 01:01 AM)Murdoch Murdoch Wrote: [ -> ]Vote labour.

Socialism is a step closer to national socialism.

National socialism is a radically flawed idea, based on autarchy and aggression, both impossible in the 21st century.
Personally I've voted labour (postal vote) but that's mainly because of their university fee plans also because I believe in Corbyn a lot more than I do Mrs May especially on her stance on grammar schools
Pages: 1 2