Hopefully now we can work on our debt and getting rid of ISIS.
The American people grew tired of the way our government is heading and now we want change, I hope he delivers.
Can't stump the trump.
RIP for every black person in America
Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
(Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
(Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
Google isn't bringing up and news reports of Republicans rioting in 2008 or 2012, could something though if you'd like to try.
(Nov 9, 2016, 10:54 AM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Do we really have to give him the nuclear warhead codes?
The president can't just order a nuclear attack like you may think. First of all, his briefcase with the codes, also called the "football", doesn't have the big red button that you may think it does. It contains codes of types of attacks and locations along with equipment to get in contact with the situation room and other military establishments. Not only could the minutemen operators just defy the order completely, the SecDef could deny the order and issue further review, etc.
TL:DR; The president doesn't have a big red button, the launch has to be authorized by others too.
But, I digress. I believe that this election was amazing, republican president, republican senate, and republican house. That seems like a good 4 years.
(Nov 9, 2016, 11:04 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
Google isn't bringing up and news reports of Republicans rioting in 2008 or 2012, could something though if you'd like to try.
No, just the fact that Donald Trump claimed that the system was rigged so if Hillary had won, I'm sure many Republicans would think that it was true.
(Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
I can't recall a single time a Republican event turned into a protest, let alone a riot. I remember when the DNC hired people to riot at Trump rallies though (Proj. Veritas)
Feel free to enlighten me.
And oh, Na, na na na Naa, Naa, told you all so.
(Nov 10, 2016, 01:32 AM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 11:04 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
Google isn't bringing up and news reports of Republicans rioting in 2008 or 2012, could something though if you'd like to try.
No, just the fact that Donald Trump claimed that the system was rigged so if Hillary had won, I'm sure many Republicans would think that it was true.
Except it was rigged, and we still won. Hillary should have done a better job.
https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/796044376216576000
https://twitter.com/TEN_GOP/status/796053302693822465
(Nov 10, 2016, 01:37 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
I can't recall a single time a Republican event turned into a protest, let alone a riot. I remember when the DNC hired people to riot at Trump rallies though (Proj. Veritas)
Feel free to enlighten me.
And oh, Na, na na na Naa, Naa, told you all so.
You said he would win and he did. Congratulations.
I can't wait to see him live up to all of his promises. Construction of the wall on day one remember? With Mexico footing the bill as well. Special investigator on Clinton and deportation of illegal Mexicans also to happen on day one. Damn, January 20th is sure going to be a busy day for President Trump.
Please keep us informed of the great changes he makes through his presidential career.
(Nov 10, 2016, 01:47 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 10, 2016, 01:32 AM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 11:04 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
Google isn't bringing up and news reports of Republicans rioting in 2008 or 2012, could something though if you'd like to try.
No, just the fact that Donald Trump claimed that the system was rigged so if Hillary had won, I'm sure many Republicans would think that it was true.
Except it was rigged, and we still won. Hillary should have done a better job.
https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/796044376216576000
https://twitter.com/TEN_GOP/status/796053302693822465
Do you know how hard it is to rig an election? The videos you linked are complete nonsense that do not prove anything. Get me proof from a reputable source and then we'll discuss this "rigged" election.
(Nov 10, 2016, 02:07 AM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 10, 2016, 01:37 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 10:18 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 9, 2016, 09:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: [ -> ]Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.
Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...
Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?
I can't recall a single time a Republican event turned into a protest, let alone a riot. I remember when the DNC hired people to riot at Trump rallies though (Proj. Veritas)
Feel free to enlighten me.
And oh, Na, na na na Naa, Naa, told you all so.
You said he would win and he did. Congratulations.
I can't wait to see him live up to all of his promises. Construction of the wall on day one remember? With Mexico footing the bill as well. Special investigator on Clinton and deportation of illegal Mexicans also to happen on day one. Damn, January 20th is sure going to be a busy day for President Trump.
Please keep us informed of the great changes he makes through his presidential career.
We ain't paying for nothing
Trump is our new president. He has (I think. Not very well educated on politics) a third maybe of power in the Executive Branch and people have common sense. Just because they are the same party, doesn't mean they'll act like drones.
Just live your life. The system is setup to negate stupidity (Even though this isn't the first time we have had a stupid president).
Oh yes, America is in excellent hands.
![[Image: sda7L.png]](https://puu.sh/sda7L.png)
I can ignore most of the dumb shit Trump comes up with but his "beliefs" (to put it lightly) in science are what could really screw the US up. He's talked of
cutting the Environmental Protection Agency (who he chose Myron Ebell to lead in the transition,
a known climate skeptic), scrapping major
US regulations on CO2 output such as the Clean Power Plan, and
"cancel" the Paris Climate Deal (he does have to wait 4 years to officially leave it, but could simply ignore the restrictions).
Here's the best part, he can't do it alone because he'll need the House and Senate to go alone with it. But they are now lead by a Republican majority who, ~56%, believe climate change isn't real or are skeptical.
Here's a list of 170 Republicans of the 114th congress (current congress) who fall in this category.
And just for kicks, "...97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities." (
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/)
Didn't vote for either of these cucks, but it'll be interesting to see how this one turns out.