(Nov 5, 2016, 07:29 PM)Faustin Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 4, 2016, 04:42 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 1, 2016, 11:32 AM)Barkles Wrote: [ -> ]
Just saying I don't like Clinton as a person but in a lesser of two evils campaign better her than old hamster features
Knowing that you agreed with Hillary Clinton on immigration issues is disgusting to me to be completely honest.
She wants to bring ISIS into America, and you think that's a good idea?
Please direct me to where she says "I want ISIL in the United States"
She never said that she wanted ISIL in the country
well. i got stein. going to be the new kung fury?
(no offense he is a nice guy, a bit idealistic but nice)
That was interesting. It's a clear, simple way to put all issues that a potential president would make decisions on into a neat little quiz, and it's good they have other stances other than 'yes' and 'no'.
Apparently I side with 3 people, I like Trump out of them the best though.
George Washington, he's a lad
(Nov 6, 2016, 04:21 PM)Innovative Wrote: [ -> ]George Washington, he's a lad
I preferred John Adams to be honest.
Chief Blue Jacket anyone?
(he's real, look it up.)
(Nov 7, 2016, 03:21 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] no rebuttal?
You really just want to argue with people don't you?
(Nov 7, 2016, 06:28 AM)thefaketaco Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 7, 2016, 03:21 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] no rebuttal?
You really just want to argue with people don't you?
Hey man don't judge, some people get off to weird shit
(Nov 7, 2016, 06:28 AM)thefaketaco Wrote: [ -> ] (Nov 7, 2016, 03:21 AM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ] no rebuttal?
You really just want to argue with people don't you?
If he wants to call me out then cower once I prove him wrong, why call me out in the first place instead of fighting for what he believes in?